Rendered at 16:34:37 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
avaer 57 minutes ago [-]
I've worked on several projects where people looked at the site, which was simple and straight to the point, and people would straight up tell me they didn't take it seriously because it didn't have these performative UI things on it.
It's like when a Youtuber's audience complains about how they're constantly asking you to subscribe. The reason it happens is because the statistics say it works.
theturtletalks 22 minutes ago [-]
It really comes down to first impression. Your website design is your company’s first impression. If the design is clean, people will believe the product is clean and robust as well. Similar to how people think things that cost more and probably high quality and better overall.
As for this website, the best component is the ASCII animation in the hero and you can’t even copy that component. In fact, that nice ASCII hero is what gave me a good first impression to go thru all the components.
Ah it’s in the hero section, kind of scanned that section but had lost interest by that point
wavemode 35 minutes ago [-]
I don't think the commentary being made here is that startup websites should not be flashy. Just that, maybe they don't all need to look exactly the same as each other.
dayjah 6 minutes ago [-]
I think homogeneity is an unavoidable end game for the internet (unfortunately).
At work we’ve been discussing whether to migrate off our home grown component library to Material UI. I shudder at the thought, personally. However, a compelling reason to use a ubiquitous framework is that the ubiquity means folks intuitively know how to interact with your product.
Like many of us I was born into a deeply customizable Internet, all of my websites were green or red on black. They were a glorious amalgam of fixed width fonts and <blink> tags. With occasional wingdings characters for fun and games and complex <table>/<tr>/<td> tags for really epic layouts. They were l33t, honestly ^_^
But, as time goes on and more and more people use this thing, converging on the one-true-UX feels like a net good thing assuming the fundamentals are right. To some degree the LLM-ization of the Internet is essentially the end game of squashing the personality out of the Internet which bootstrap started.
We’re on the cusp of spoken word being the core UX of computers with a fall back to reading the LLM transcript, neither of which benefits from <blink>
jsdalton 23 minutes ago [-]
It seems to me the parent commenter is saying the opposite: looking exactly like each other _is_ the point. It's a form of social signaling, to indicate that a project "belongs" to the in group of high-flying successful AI hype projects.
Note I'm not arguing that this is a good strategy. But given that so many people follow it I imagine it's not as bad as it appears on the surface.
epolanski 46 minutes ago [-]
Same for clickbait thumbnails, people hate them, and yet don't really click on non clickbaity ones.
thewebguyd 40 minutes ago [-]
In the marketing world this is called revealed preference. This stuff is A/B tested to death. Anyone trying to sell something is best served by watching people's behavior instead of listening to what they say, as the two are often different if not polar opposites.
4chandaily 5 minutes ago [-]
The perspective marketing world seems toxic. From the perspective of the "consumer", it sure does feel like we are being "ignored", "tricked", or "bamboozled" when our stated preferences are ignored in favor of "revealed preference".
It isn't that we have a "preference" for these things, it is far more likely that a user just doesn't have their guard up 100% of the time, and these psychological manipulations are designed to cut through that.
Sure, these strategies probably net clicks, but they aren't from people who "chose" your product, they are clicks from people who were manipulated into clicking.
I suppose whether you think that is okay depends on your industry and ethics.
Terretta 14 minutes ago [-]
“TokenStream – Server-sent events (SSE) were added to the HTML5 spec in 2008 but never used until 2025.”
I remember chunked transfer encoding shipped in 1997. It's been possible since then to readily and easily stream bytes of text or chunks of html the way everyone sees LLMs do today.
I used this to write a web based telnet client in 1997, and later a text moo / chat for the web. In both cases used a frameset so your line to send was at bottom of screen, the incoming lines were server-sent as things happened server side, and scrolled the client as new lines came in.
There were other things you could abuse before that, but less reliable.
But yeah, talk about things nobody used....
aogaili 9 minutes ago [-]
It's still better than the sh*t developers produced three years ago.
Some people just like to feel superior by shaming others' work. You can easily tweak the visual output if you want to, but it's good enough for most use cases and better than what developers used to produce.
So, it's progress.
chrisra 8 minutes ago [-]
Agreed. I enjoy looking at and using a lot of these components.
tfitz237 2 hours ago [-]
These all look very professional for (basically) a parody library
sv123 4 minutes ago [-]
Definitely bookmarking for future ideas and inspiration, don't care if I'm shamed for it.
csomar 58 minutes ago [-]
What are the odds some companies end up using it for a real product?
eranation 51 minutes ago [-]
100%
Boxxed 1 hours ago [-]
...which might just show how predictable and similar all janky startup pages are.
NuclearPM 1 hours ago [-]
Janky?
padolsey 1 hours ago [-]
The most extreme virtue-signal is to go completely browser-default and have no styling whatsoever. Like lowercasing because your pinky can't be arsed to reach for the shift-key even though you've a billion dollars in series A.
psadauskas 48 minutes ago [-]
I've mostly stopped caring about using using proper capitalization, commas, grammar and spelling in my writing of comments, primarily as a signal that i'm not an llm.
nozzlegear 24 minutes ago [-]
If you turn on HN's "Show Dead" setting, there are tons of LLM-generated comments on stories related to AI. You can see the human(s) behind the LLM trying to fiddle with the style of comment by making them skip proper grammar, capitalization, use or avoid certain phrases, and so on. The biggest tell for LLM content, though, is just the content as a whole: it sounds fake and ungenuine, like it passed through a committee of hostage negotiators to remove the speaker's own attachment/expectations.
They can configure it to use all lowercase letters, skip em-dashes, make grammar mistakes, stop saying "it's not X, it's Y", or whatever, yet the content itself just has a fake quality to it that makes it stand out, which is why those comments still get flagged IMO.
frantathefranta 42 minutes ago [-]
Claude's "write me a product description like a cool human would" is just using lower-case where it shouldn't be though.
Waterluvian 1 hours ago [-]
Netscape knows best.
ghurtado 35 minutes ago [-]
Give me Navigator or give me death
sph 1 hours ago [-]
Ah yes, the jeevacation special
arm32 47 minutes ago [-]
Craziest m'island
MrBuddyCasino 1 hours ago [-]
Array language proponents also like to do this. In their case I‘ll allow it, it matches the substance.
I get the whole trope thing and maybe I'm just an old man but I still am kinda impressed when Claude sh*ts out this type of UI 100 times faster than I ever could. It might also be that I never could have made UI even of this quality before AI. (˶ˆᗜˆ˵)
jrflo 2 hours ago [-]
That ascii lava lamp effect is low key really cool
tyleo 41 minutes ago [-]
Yeah probably my favorite of the bunch too. I bet there’s a fun project to do to make a customizer for that.
carlos-menezes 2 hours ago [-]
Lags the hell out of my browser (Safari) window though.
lizhang 2 hours ago [-]
sorry in advance if this post causes more sites to use that effect
wait my readme isnt performative enough yet, let me add a chart showing the star history
eranation 43 minutes ago [-]
My Claude feels personally attacked.
jtbayly 1 hours ago [-]
I could see actually using this…
Brajeshwar 1 hours ago [-]
Many a true word is spoken in jest.
kardianos 1 hours ago [-]
Savage and accurate. 100%.
yosef123 1 hours ago [-]
This needs an additional subscriptions service tier, that's even more performative and even more AI
erdaltoprak 2 hours ago [-]
It's very fun and way too polished, thanks!
staminade 1 hours ago [-]
Very funny. Although ironic that this whole library was built with AI.
sbarre 60 minutes ago [-]
Ironic, or appropriate?
ghurtado 34 minutes ago [-]
Ironically appropriate
heldrida 1 hours ago [-]
Spot on "AI Native".
cmrdporcupine 1 hours ago [-]
NGL I'm going to steal/borrow/leach all sorts of these for my product.
When in Rome!
smhanov 1 hours ago [-]
It needs a purple gradient mode.
wg0 2 hours ago [-]
Man... That's satire on a whole another level. What a technical and deep sense of humor.
MisterKent 2 hours ago [-]
Now I can produce slop without AI.
sph 56 minutes ago [-]
Why would you do that, when you can make shit nobody needs 10x faster with AI
hyperhello 31 minutes ago [-]
The author should have AI set up a simple deployment to EC2 and Azure and make an endless series of semantically meaningless AI companies with web sites and submit them everywhere. The web sites should also do this themselves.
igurss 2 hours ago [-]
Nice UI quality
ajpaulson 1 hours ago [-]
Lmao!!! Awesome
imafish 2 hours ago [-]
I heard you like AI slop...
utopiah 45 minutes ago [-]
Neat, opened an issue there for a finicky bit of code that'd help me quite a bit. /s
Yawn. This is just bootstrap all over again. So what if people who don't have design skills can now create pleasant looking websites?
ghurtado 30 minutes ago [-]
The thing about humor is that you don't have to tell people when you don't get a joke, you can just quietly continue to live your life while you wait for your next chance to be temporarily happy.
It's like when a Youtuber's audience complains about how they're constantly asking you to subscribe. The reason it happens is because the statistics say it works.
As for this website, the best component is the ASCII animation in the hero and you can’t even copy that component. In fact, that nice ASCII hero is what gave me a good first impression to go thru all the components.
At work we’ve been discussing whether to migrate off our home grown component library to Material UI. I shudder at the thought, personally. However, a compelling reason to use a ubiquitous framework is that the ubiquity means folks intuitively know how to interact with your product.
Like many of us I was born into a deeply customizable Internet, all of my websites were green or red on black. They were a glorious amalgam of fixed width fonts and <blink> tags. With occasional wingdings characters for fun and games and complex <table>/<tr>/<td> tags for really epic layouts. They were l33t, honestly ^_^
But, as time goes on and more and more people use this thing, converging on the one-true-UX feels like a net good thing assuming the fundamentals are right. To some degree the LLM-ization of the Internet is essentially the end game of squashing the personality out of the Internet which bootstrap started.
We’re on the cusp of spoken word being the core UX of computers with a fall back to reading the LLM transcript, neither of which benefits from <blink>
Note I'm not arguing that this is a good strategy. But given that so many people follow it I imagine it's not as bad as it appears on the surface.
It isn't that we have a "preference" for these things, it is far more likely that a user just doesn't have their guard up 100% of the time, and these psychological manipulations are designed to cut through that.
Sure, these strategies probably net clicks, but they aren't from people who "chose" your product, they are clicks from people who were manipulated into clicking.
I suppose whether you think that is okay depends on your industry and ethics.
I remember chunked transfer encoding shipped in 1997. It's been possible since then to readily and easily stream bytes of text or chunks of html the way everyone sees LLMs do today.
I used this to write a web based telnet client in 1997, and later a text moo / chat for the web. In both cases used a frameset so your line to send was at bottom of screen, the incoming lines were server-sent as things happened server side, and scrolled the client as new lines came in.
There were other things you could abuse before that, but less reliable.
But yeah, talk about things nobody used....
Some people just like to feel superior by shaming others' work. You can easily tweak the visual output if you want to, but it's good enough for most use cases and better than what developers used to produce.
So, it's progress.
They can configure it to use all lowercase letters, skip em-dashes, make grammar mistakes, stop saying "it's not X, it's Y", or whatever, yet the content itself just has a fake quality to it that makes it stand out, which is why those comments still get flagged IMO.
you're literate smart... poetic; because
you read e.e.cummings
and william carlos
williams
...
fin.
When in Rome!